Rebuttal of Con
نویسنده
چکیده
1. Wolfe JM et al. Does morphine change the physical examination in patients with acute appendicitis? American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2004;22:280-285. 2. Thomas SH et al. Effects of morphine analgesia on diagnostic accuracy in emergency department patients with abdominal pain: a prospective randomized trial. Journal of American College of Surgeons 2003;196:18-31. 3. LoVecchio F et al. The use of analgesic in patients with acute abdominal pain. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997;15:775-779. 4. Vernculen B et al. Acute appendicitis: influence of early pain relief on the accuracy of clinical and US findings in the decision to operate—a randomized trial. Radiology 1999;210:639-643. 5. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, “Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268:2420-2425. 6. Haydel M et al. Indication for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;343:100-105. 7. Stiell IG et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:13911396.
منابع مشابه
Rebuttal of the Con View: Albuminuria Is an Appropriate Therapeutic Target in Patients with CKD.
Our opponents in this debate state that there are insufficient data to consider albuminuria as a valid target for therapy in patients with CKD. They base their opinion predominantly on two arguments: first, a decrease in albuminuria is not always associated with renoprotection, and second, no prospective randomized controlled trial has been conducted that really targeted albuminuria.
متن کاملHighlighting Effect: The Function of Rebuttals in Written Argument
A rebutting counterargument is considered a very effective strategy to make one’s own argument more persuasive; however, the possible reasons behind this are not clear. In this study, we investigated the effects of rebutting counterarguments on persuasiveness in written arguments. One hundred undergraduate students were assigned randomly to two conditions: a “non-rebuttal condition” and a “rebu...
متن کاملTo what extent is cadaver dissection necessary to learn medical gross anatomy? A debate forum.
In this Olympic year of 2004 in Athens, Greece, which is considered the birthplace of modern Olympics, controversy was inescapable. Whether it was the points awarded by the judges for gymnastics, Paula Radcliffe dropping out of the women’s marathon, or drug-testing scandals, controversy swirled. So, too, we find there is controversy within the arena of anatomical education for medical students....
متن کاملCharacterizing Uncertainty Associated with Middle School Students’ Scientific Arguments
In this study, we investigated how students’ claim, justification, uncertainty, and conditions of rebuttal contribute to the measurement of the overall scientific argumentation ability. We designed six sets of items, each of which consisted of claim, justification, uncertainty rating, and conditions of rebuttal items. These item sets addressed six investigations related to climate change and ex...
متن کاملImages are not and should not ever be type specimens: a rebuttal to Garraffoni & Freitas.
Note. This original form of this rebuttal was submitted to Science on 3 March 2017 (limited to 300 words as per Science editorial policy) but rejected on 13 March 2017. Herein, we elaborate on our original Science submission in order to more fully address the issue without the length limitations. This rebuttal is followed by the list of the signatories who supported our original submission.
متن کاملRebuttal from Millet, Faiss, and Pialoux.
Read more and get great! That's what the book enPDFd rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux will give for every reader to read this book. This is an on-line book provided in this website. Even this book becomes a choice of someone to read, many in the world also loves it so much. As what we talk, when you read more every page of this rebuttal from millet faiss and pialoux, what you will obtain ...
متن کامل